Predictive policing has been used as a "governance tool" in China for a decade, but as a "governance object," it has only recently entered the research field. There are three major risks associated with predictive policing: prediction accuracy, service normativity, and social adaptability. Given the inherent uncertainties of predictions and the limitations of interventions, the aspiration to "stopping crime before it begins" remains a challenge. The future aim should be to elevate prediction accuracy and, within ethically and legally acceptable limits, convert predictive insights into tangible governance practices.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
Summary
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 Research Background
1.2 Research Significance
1.3 Literature Review
1.4 Research Methods
1.5 Innovation and Limitations
Chapter 2 Basic Concepts and Theoretical Foundations
2.1 The Journey of Predictive Policing
2.2 Risks in Predictive Policing
2.3 The Regulation of Risk
Chapter 3 The Risk of Prediction Accuracy in Predictive Policing
3.1 The Nature of the Risk of Prediction Accuracy
3.2 Causes of the Risk of Predictive Accuracy
3.3 Consequences of the Risk of Predictive Accuracy
Chapter 4 The Risk of Service Normativity in Predictive Policing
4.1 The Nature of the Risk of Service Normativity
4.2 Causes of the Risk of Service Normativity
4.3 Consequences of the Risk of Service Normativity
Chapter 5 The Risk of Social Adaptability in Predictive Policing
5.1 The Nature of the Risk of Social Adaptability
5.2 Causes of the Risk of Social Adaptability
5.3 Consequences of the Risk of Social Adaptability
Chapter 6 Risk Regulation in Predictive Policing
6.1 Core Principles of Risk Regulation in Predictive Policing
6.2 Technical Approaches of Risk Regulation in Predictive Policing
6.3 Normative Approaches of Risk Regulation in Predictive Policing
6.4 Ethical Approaches of Risk Regulation in Predictive Policing
Conclusion
References
