The Individualization of War examines the status of individuals in contemporary armed conflict in three main capacities: as subject to violence but deserving of protection; as liable to harm because of their responsibility for attacks on others; and as agents who can be held accountable for the perpetration of crimes.
Inhaltsverzeichnis
- Introduction: Understanding Individualisation
- Part I Extending Individualisation in the Ethics and Law of Armed Conflict
- 1: Adil Haque: After War and Peace
- 2: Anne Peters: The Direct Rights of Individuals in the International Law of Armed Conflict
- 3: Bradley Jay Strawser: The Supererogatory Moral Risks of Military Service
- Part II Rethinking Individualisation: Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives
- 4: Victor Tadros: Collective Values in Just and Unjust Wars
- 5: Benjamin Valentino: Situationism and the Individualisation of Responsibility in War
- Part III The Consequences of Individualisation
- 6: Paola Gaeta and Abhimanyu George Jain: The Individualisation of IHL Rules through Criminalisation for War Crimes: Some (un)intended Consequences
- 7: Sarah Nouwen: Tensions between the Pursuit of Criminal Accountability and Other International Policy Agendas in Situations of Armed Conflict
- 8: Paul D. Williams: Two Decades of Civilian Protection Mandates for United Nations Peacekeepers
- Part IV Beyond Formal Armed Conflict
- 9: Pablo Kalmanovitz and Miriam Bradley: Individualisation of Collectivisation in Contexts of Organized Criminal Violence: The Case of Mexico's 'War on Organised Crime'