Alternative of Real Ecology

The feeling, taste, financial profit, comfort/luxury, convenience, and many other modern human requirements (needs) are nothing compared to Nature (once you are able to feel her). That is Real Ecology: not buying, using, and consuming as much as possible that is un-ecological a. k. a. causing the ecocide.

Environmentalism is not ecology although frequently using the term ecology (the science). It is not based on the same rules (Laws of Nature, Natural selection, etc.) and facts. Simply because the conditions to apply and enforce the rules change with evolution and they adapt to the needs of modern humans and their existence. What was environmentalism yesterday, is not environmentalism today. And that will change in the future. Naturally there are different 'kinds' of environmentalism (to suit every taste, personal/political conviction, etc.) as humans are different. Popular environmentalism is based on popularity, radical environmentalism on frustration and rebellion, etc. The human factor ('humans first') is always included. However Real Ecology is ironically a human created alternative to eliminate the modern human factor.

Real Ecology is no smoking or using psychoactive drugs, no gluttony/hedonism, and many other things. One of them is coffee; there is no spiritual, physical, or biological need to drink it. Plus the environmental damage it causes: But coffee is so much more than just a drink. As the world's second most tradable commodity after oil, coffee is now a multibillion dollar global industry and growing. We are all aware of fair trade coffee but have you ever stopped to think what impacts the world's favourite beverage is having on our planet?

One cannot deny his humanity and stay human (that is logical) and therefore one must become inhuman to deny his humanity. This is where Real Ecology comes into the picture.

There is no point in worrying how would human existence look after the collapse of the environment, if they would be able to live primitive lives in the post apocalyptic world; they would survive and adapt. While humans discuss the collapse of the environment naturally the question of humans is the most important. "Humans destroyed Nature and do not have a right to survive!" is the latest on a human mind. The priority for humans is the continuity of modern human existence when in not its current form then in another one. Real Ecology is fully aware that humans will survive an environmental collapse. Future generations will acclimatize, learn to exists without biodiversity/wilderness. Obese people will become thin with the shortage of food. Smokers will survive without cigarettes, etc. People will get used to the impact that the ecocide will bring.

The priority of Real Ecology is Nature and the duty to point out that it will be destroyed. Not how much the existence of humans will be miserable. It is not the duty of Real Ecology to stop the ecocide. That is impossible. It is there to stop destroying Nature by one person at a time: the inner change and non-contribution. Nature and ecology are above all human concepts. Simply because if there would be no water, air, and soil all humans would die together with all their concepts.

"This has nothing to do with ecology!" Wrong, this has nothing to do with environmentalism. It is not the science of ecology, it is ecology on a personal level; a real relationship with Nature. A relationship where Nature gives everything for free and humans destroy Nature in return might be a lot of things, but definitely not ecology. Even if humans consider that ecology, then it is not Real Ecology. There is nothing real about/in such a relationship.